ScrumMasters Ought to Not Additionally Be Product House owners


In some unspecified time in the future, you have most likely puzzled, can the product proprietor and the Scrum Grasp be the identical individual? Banish that thought!

You would not be the primary individual to attempt combining the Scrum Grasp function with the product proprietor function. Individuals ask me each day if they will mix the roles of product and ScrumMaster and provides each units of obligations to a single individual.

Typically, making an attempt to fill these two roles with one individual is a really unhealthy concept. Totally different people ought to fill these two roles. To see why, let’s look again in historical past on the job of being a pirate ship captain.

The Pirates Knew: Totally different Expertise Require Totally different Individuals

Professor Hayagreeva Rao wrote in Harvard Enterprise Evaluation concerning the outcomes of asking his MBA college students to design the job of a seventeenth century pirate ship captain. His MBA college students designed a job that lumped collectively two areas of accountability:

  • Star duties: These are the strategic work of deciding which ships to assault, commanding the crew throughout battle, negotiating with different captains, and so forth
  • Guardian duties: These are the operational work of distributing their pirate booty, settling battle, punishing crew members, and organizing look after the wounded

The issue with this job description is that it mixes star and guardian duties. As Professor Rao factors out, there are only a few people who excel at each varieties of process.

Star duties require risk-taking and entrepreneurship, whereas guardian duties require conscientiousness and consistency. A pirate captain good at figuring out ships to assault and at main his crew into battle would possible be bored by the executive trivia of the guardian duties. 

To make issues worse, Professor Rao asserts that folks are likely to spend most of their effort on the duties they’re good at (and presumably get pleasure from). My expertise actually bears this out. Which means it’s even more durable to succeed when mixing roles that require completely different expertise.

Pirates solved the issue by having two leaders on every ship: a captain liable for the star duties and a quartermaster basic liable for the guardian duties. 

4 Causes Scrum Masters Ought to Not Additionally Be Product House owners

So what does the decidedly non-collaborative, non-agile atmosphere of a pirate ship should do with Scrum? Simply as pirate ships had separate people as captain and quartermaster basic, agile initiatives ought to have separate Scrum Masters and product homeowners. Let us take a look at 4 explanation why the product proprietor and Scrum Grasp shouldn’t be the identical individual.

1. Scrum Masters and Product House owners Carry out Totally different Duties 

First, the roles of product proprietor and ScrumMaster have very completely different obligations (accountabilities), and subsequently require very completely different expertise. Product homeowners carry out the star duties of building a imaginative and prescient for a product, defining one of the best outcomes the product can create for its customers, and defining the options that can get it there. Scrum Masters carry out the guardian duties of defending a workforce from distractions and enhancing collaboration and focus. 

That’s, whereas a product proprietor is figuring out what to construct, the ScrumMaster helps the workforce work collectively to allow them to.

In some ways, this may be regarded as just like the concept that a workforce’s programmer and tester must be separate. Positive, a very good programmer can take a look at and a very good tester can program. However, separating these roles is normally a good suggestion.

2. Every Function Is a Full-Time Job on Its Personal

Second, it’s fairly possible that being both ScrumMaster or product proprietor requires full- or close to full-time consideration. Placing one individual in each roles on the identical time will nearly actually shortchange one of many two.

3. Product House owners and Scrum Masters Are likely to Have Totally different Personalities

Third, there’s some overlap within the expertise and character traits that make good product homeowners and ScrumMasters. Nevertheless, the roles are completely different, and this can be very unlikely that somebody will have the ability to excel at each, particularly on the identical time.

4. A Pure Pressure Exists Between Product Proprietor and Scrum Grasp roles

Lastly, a pure pressure ought to exist between the product proprietor and Scrum Grasp roles. Though every is undeniably dedicated to the success of the product or system being developed, product homeowners naturally need extra, extra, extra.

ScrumMasters, then again, are extra attuned to the problems that may come up from a workforce below undue strain to ship extra, extra, extra.

When a stability exists between the roles, a product proprietor is free to comply with their pure tendency to ask for extra, secure with the peace of mind that the ScrumMaster will forestall pushing too arduous.

Are There Ever Exceptions?

As with all rule, there are occasions when one individual can act as a Scrum Grasp and product proprietor on the identical time. I’ve encountered conditions during which the ScrumMaster and product proprietor have been the identical individual, and the place I felt that was applicable. A few of these have included small organizations that might not afford the posh of devoted or separate people.

Different conditions have been small groups who had began within the pursuit of a technical product proprietor’s imaginative and prescient. On such small groups, anybody character can have an outsized impact on the workforce, no matter any formal function performed by the individual.

Different exceptions have been ScrumMasters concerned in contract improvement. It’s common on such a venture for the “true product proprietor” to exist inside the consumer asking for the software program to be constructed. Sadly, additionally it is widespread for such true product homeowners to not need to be deeply concerned within the venture on the degree a Scrum workforce wants. It’s in these circumstances {that a} good ScrumMaster usually steps up and into the function as a proxy for that true product proprietor.

And in a couple of particular situations, I’ve seen somebody fill each roles efficiently, in opposition to all odds. Every has been an distinctive individual, maybe the Blackbeards of Scrum. Nevertheless, in every case, my response was to assume how significantly better the individual might have carried out if enabled to work in solely one of many roles.

So, positive there are exceptions—identical to there are to any rule. Nevertheless, none of these exceptions ought to exist for the long run. And anybody in each roles concurrently ought to concentrate on the challenges the twin function presents. And in addition ought to take into account what they would possibly lose in making an attempt to fill each roles.

Recent Articles

Related Stories

Leave A Reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay on op - Ge the daily news in your inbox