It’s time to flip the script on local weather motion.
The federal authorities has dropped at bear a formidable suite of local weather measures — for which it has by no means obtained sufficient credit score — however moderately than wielding all this difficult and noble work just like the political sword it ought to be, our Liberal leaders are parrying assault after assault from the Opposition.
There’s each cause to count on they’ll be parrying a complete lot extra on April 1 and afterwards.
However whereas the federal authorities is true to level out the financial effectivity of carbon pricing and the truth that most Canadians get extra money again than they pay, these are additionally defensive rebuttals. And in politics, one of the best defence actually is an offence.
It’s helpful to introduce some communications jargon right here. A sword concern is basically a subject you need to be speaking about since you imagine you’re stronger on it than your opponent. In contrast, a protect concern is one your opponent feels robust on — their sword concern — placing you on the defensive.
There isn’t any query that the Conservative Occasion of Canada is wielding the carbon tax as, properly, an axe.
However the governing Liberals ought to spend much less time elevating their shields and extra time hanging first. Placing in opposition to the Opposition and sure provinces which have skirted their duty on local weather motion for too lengthy, merely letting the federal authorities do the work for them, solely to complain about carbon pricing for perceived political acquire.
Certainly, politics is the final word funhouse mirror: a grain of sand can grow to be distorted right into a mountain and a mountain right into a speck on the glass.
So it has grow to be with carbon pricing — a coverage that leaves most households higher off and is chargeable for a minuscule 0.3 per cent of meals value will increase — and the actual mountain that has in some way retreated to the horizon: local weather motion. (By which I imply the myriad measures we’re taking to assist stop the best menace to our lifestyle. That little factor.)
What’s extra — and sadly ironic in all this — is that local weather change has by no means been extra current, extra actual and extra disastrous for Canadians from coast to coast, to coast.
Final 12 months was Canada’s worst wildfire season ever, ensuing within the full-scale evacuation of a capital metropolis, Yellowknife. Issues aren’t essentially wanting up in 2024, as Alberta declared an early begin to the wildfire season in February.
In Ontario, the place excessive warmth days are anticipated to triple, the well being prices alone from final 12 months’s wildfires clocked in at an estimated $1.28 billion in a single week in only one province.
And in B.C., additionally no stranger to record-setting wildfires, the province’s wine and cherry industries are nervous a few “catastrophic” and “devastating” 12 months as a result of current excessive climate occasions. Whereas on the other coast, Nova Scotia is recovering from $170 million in insured damages from final 12 months’s floods.
The summers are unhealthy sufficient, however even our winters are more and more much less Canadian. Ottawa’s Rideau Canal was closed completely to skating in 2023 and was open simply 10 days this previous winter. It’s usually open January, February and generally March. An Ontarian I spoke with lately talked about the pond by his home didn’t freeze over this 12 months.
What’s extra Canadian than a recreation of hockey within the nice open air?
Maybe the most important funhouse mirror distortion of all is the suggestion that clear vitality threatens our lifestyle as if driving an EV is basically so completely different from driving a gasoline automotive.
The truth is that local weather motion is, after all, the one solution to defend our lifestyle — the pastimes we treasure, the experiences we grew up with and need to move all the way down to our children. It’s additionally the one solution to construct a sustainable economic system and decrease vitality payments long run as we free ourselves from the unstable geopolitics of fossil fuels.
This shouldn’t be a protect concern for the federal authorities.
After April 1, the actual query on repeat ought to be: What would the Opposition and sure premiers do as a substitute, as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau rightly lately requested?
How would they defend us from the environmental, financial and expensive impacts of local weather change?
How would they assist Canada sustain because the world transitions away from fossil fuels?
Silence ought to be a scandal.
This submit initially appeared within the Nationwide Observer.