sparklyr.sedona
is now out there
because the sparklyr
-based R interface for Apache Sedona.
To put in sparklyr.sedona
from GitHub utilizing
the remotes
package deal
, run
remotes::install_github(repo = "apache/incubator-sedona", subdir = "R/sparklyr.sedona")
On this weblog put up, we are going to present a fast introduction to sparklyr.sedona
, outlining the motivation behind
this sparklyr
extension, and presenting some instance sparklyr.sedona
use instances involving Spark spatial RDDs,
Spark dataframes, and visualizations.
Motivation for sparklyr.sedona
A suggestion from the
mlverse survey outcomes earlier
this 12 months talked about the necessity for up-to-date R interfaces for Spark-based GIS frameworks.
Whereas trying into this suggestion, we realized about
Apache Sedona, a geospatial information system powered by Spark
that’s fashionable, environment friendly, and simple to make use of. We additionally realized that whereas our mates from the
Spark open-source neighborhood had developed a
sparklyr
extension for GeoSpark, the
predecessor of Apache Sedona, there was no comparable extension making newer Sedona
functionalities simply accessible from R but.
We due to this fact determined to work on sparklyr.sedona
, which goals to bridge the hole between
Sedona and R.
The lay of the land
We hope you might be prepared for a fast tour by a few of the RDD-based and
Spark-dataframe-based functionalities in sparklyr.sedona
, and in addition, some bedazzling
visualizations derived from geospatial information in Spark.
In Apache Sedona,
Spatial Resilient Distributed Datasets(SRDDs)
are fundamental constructing blocks of distributed spatial information encapsulating
“vanilla” RDDs of
geometrical objects and indexes. SRDDs assist low-level operations equivalent to Coordinate Reference System (CRS)
transformations, spatial partitioning, and spatial indexing. For instance, with sparklyr.sedona
, SRDD-based operations we are able to carry out embody the next:
- Importing some exterior information supply right into a SRDD:
library(sparklyr)
library(sparklyr.sedona)
sedona_git_repo <- normalizePath("~/incubator-sedona")
data_dir <- file.path(sedona_git_repo, "core", "src", "check", "assets")
sc <- spark_connect(grasp = "native")
pt_rdd <- sedona_read_dsv_to_typed_rdd(
sc,
location = file.path(data_dir, "arealm.csv"),
kind = "level"
)
- Making use of spatial partitioning to all information factors:
sedona_apply_spatial_partitioner(pt_rdd, partitioner = "kdbtree")
- Constructing spatial index on every partition:
sedona_build_index(pt_rdd, kind = "quadtree")
- Becoming a member of one spatial information set with one other utilizing “include” or “overlap” because the be part of predicate:
polygon_rdd <- sedona_read_dsv_to_typed_rdd(
sc,
location = file.path(data_dir, "primaryroads-polygon.csv"),
kind = "polygon"
)
pts_per_region_rdd <- sedona_spatial_join_count_by_key(
pt_rdd,
polygon_rdd,
join_type = "include",
partitioner = "kdbtree"
)
It’s price mentioning that sedona_spatial_join()
will carry out spatial partitioning
and indexing on the inputs utilizing the partitioner
and index_type
provided that the inputs
should not partitioned or listed as specified already.
From the examples above, one can see that SRDDs are nice for spatial operations requiring
fine-grained management, e.g., for guaranteeing a spatial be part of question is executed as effectively
as potential with the correct kinds of spatial partitioning and indexing.
Lastly, we are able to attempt visualizing the be part of consequence above, utilizing a choropleth map:
which provides us the next:
Wait, however one thing appears amiss. To make the visualization above look nicer, we are able to
overlay it with the contour of every polygonal area:
contours <- sedona_render_scatter_plot(
polygon_rdd,
resolution_x = 1000,
resolution_y = 600,
output_location = tempfile("scatter-plot-"),
boundary = c(-126.790180, -64.630926, 24.863836, 50.000),
base_color = c(255, 0, 0),
browse = FALSE
)
sedona_render_choropleth_map(
pts_per_region_rdd,
resolution_x = 1000,
resolution_y = 600,
output_location = tempfile("choropleth-map-"),
boundary = c(-126.790180, -64.630926, 24.863836, 50.000),
base_color = c(63, 127, 255),
overlay = contours
)
which provides us the next:
With some low-level spatial operations taken care of utilizing the SRDD API and
the correct spatial partitioning and indexing information constructions, we are able to then
import the outcomes from SRDDs to Spark dataframes. When working with spatial
objects inside Spark dataframes, we are able to write high-level, declarative queries
on these objects utilizing dplyr
verbs at the side of Sedona
spatial UDFs, e.g.
, the
following question tells us whether or not every of the 8
nearest polygons to the
question level accommodates that time, and in addition, the convex hull of every polygon.
tbl <- DBI::dbGetQuery(
sc, "SELECT ST_GeomFromText("POINT(-66.3 18)") AS `pt`"
)
pt <- tbl$pt[[1]]
knn_rdd <- sedona_knn_query(
polygon_rdd, x = pt, okay = 8, index_type = "rtree"
)
knn_sdf <- knn_rdd %>%
sdf_register() %>%
dplyr::mutate(
contains_pt = ST_contains(geometry, ST_Point(-66.3, 18)),
convex_hull = ST_ConvexHull(geometry)
)
knn_sdf %>% print()
# Supply: spark<?> [?? x 3]
geometry contains_pt convex_hull
<record> <lgl> <record>
1 <POLYGON ((-66.335674 17.986328… TRUE <POLYGON ((-66.335674 17.986328,…
2 <POLYGON ((-66.335432 17.986626… TRUE <POLYGON ((-66.335432 17.986626,…
3 <POLYGON ((-66.335432 17.986626… TRUE <POLYGON ((-66.335432 17.986626,…
4 <POLYGON ((-66.335674 17.986328… TRUE <POLYGON ((-66.335674 17.986328,…
5 <POLYGON ((-66.242489 17.988637… FALSE <POLYGON ((-66.242489 17.988637,…
6 <POLYGON ((-66.242489 17.988637… FALSE <POLYGON ((-66.242489 17.988637,…
7 <POLYGON ((-66.24221 17.988799,… FALSE <POLYGON ((-66.24221 17.988799, …
8 <POLYGON ((-66.24221 17.988799,… FALSE <POLYGON ((-66.24221 17.988799, …
Acknowledgements
The creator of this weblog put up wish to thank Jia Yu,
the creator of Apache Sedona, and Lorenz Walthert for
their suggestion to contribute sparklyr.sedona
to the upstream
incubator-sedona repository. Jia has offered
in depth code-review suggestions to make sure sparklyr.sedona
complies with coding requirements
and greatest practices of the Apache Sedona venture, and has additionally been very useful within the
instrumentation of CI workflows verifying sparklyr.sedona
works as anticipated with snapshot
variations of Sedona libraries from improvement branches.
The creator can also be grateful for his colleague Sigrid Keydana
for helpful editorial strategies on this weblog put up.
That’s all. Thanks for studying!