Practically half of all $1 billion-plus corporations are failing the Plastics Scorecard


Of greater than 200 corporations with a minimum of $1 billion in annual income, none — zero — are doing sufficient to cut back, reuse and recycle plastics of their merchandise, in accordance with a brand new report by the shareholder advocacy group As You Sow and Ubuntoo, a consultancy that provides sustainability options for big firms. 

The 2024 Plastics Scorecard, revealed June 12, additionally alleges that plastic “depth” is definitely rising — which means the quantity of plastic used to generate every greenback in gross sales is rising.

The report scrutinized 225 corporations throughout 15 industries, awarding every firm a grade on a scale from A to F, relying on their achievements in decreasing the quantity of plastic they use, enhancing the recyclability of their merchandise, and reusing post-consumer plastic waste.

None acquired an A. The commonest grade, held by 107 companies — almost half — was an F.

There’s an enormous distinction between recyclability that’s in principle or technically recyclable, versus recyclability in follow and at scale.

“Each trade and each firm may be doing extra on plastics, and must be,” As You Sow’s Round Economic system Supervisor Kelly McBee mentioned. “We aren’t on observe to take motion in opposition to this rising menace.”

What grades did they get?

  • Vogue home Stella McCartney was the perfect firm on the checklist with the one B-plus grade. 
  • The one strong B marks had been for The Coca-Cola Co., H&M Group, SC Johnson and Keurig Dr Pepper.
  • Solely 4 p.c of the companies earned a B-minus or higher. 
  • Among the many 46 C grades had been Diageo, Starbucks Espresso Firm and Natura & Co. Walmart, Nestle and Colgate-Palmolive fared barely higher, every with a C-plus. Apple, Clorox, Mars, McDonald’s and Goal had C-minus grades.
  • There have been 64 D grades. PepsiCo had a D-plus. IKEA earned a D-minus, alongside PFAS makers 3M and Dow.
  • 107 corporations held Fs, a failing grade, together with Amazon, Basic Mills, Macy’s, Campbell Soup Firm and Grupo Bimbo.
    ​​​​​​​Most companies are setting too low of a bar and goals, and progressing slowly on them, according to researchers. Cosmetics companies, in particular, are off track on their strong ambitions.

What ought to corporations do?

As You Sow, primarily based in Berkeley, California, and Ubuntoo urged corporations to take motion in six areas:

1. Recyclability

Making merchandise which are really recyclable was the most typical aim, made by 147 corporations. However solely 22 corporations had been on observe to satisfy it.

“There’s an enormous distinction between recyclability that’s in principle or technically recyclable, versus recyclability in follow and at scale,” Venky Kidi, Ubuntoo co-founder and report companion, mentioned. Ubuntoo is predicated in Atlanta, Georgia.

“What meaning is corporations have to outline recyclability — and that is really accomplished fairly properly by the Ellen MacArthur Basis — in a means that permits shoppers to have entry to recycling amenities, and a good portion of shoppers ought to be capable of ship their packaging again to be recycled after which introduced again into the economic system,” Kidi mentioned.

2. Discount

Lowering the whole quantity of plastic used entails each reducing virgin plastic in addition to utilizing much less plastic in merchandise and packaging.

Corporations which have objectives to cut back complete plastic utilization in addition to plastic depth are those getting the very best scores, Kidi mentioned.

3. Recycled content material

One-hundred-and-forty-five corporations have objectives to ramp up recycled content material. The report scores corporations extra extremely for prioritizing post-consumer over post-industrial plastic. 

“There’s loads of proof to point out that beverage container deposit schemes have a tendency to enhance recycled content material availability, which is the only largest impediment for corporations to get entry to recycled materials,” Kidi mentioned.

4. Restoration

Essentially the most bold aim, held by solely 9 of the businesses, is to get better packaging from the setting, Kidi mentioned. Some have dedicated to one hundred pc restoration of post-consumer waste.

5. Reuse

Forty-three corporations are exploring reusable packaging in pilots, together with in package-free and refillable codecs. However these demo initiatives aren’t making it into on a regular basis enterprise practices, McBee mentioned.

“So one in all our suggestions is that corporations take the learnings from these reusable pilots and set new objectives, make new commitments for the way these may be everlasting practices,” she mentioned.

6. Prolonged producer accountability 

within the final 5 years, 73 corporations have issued statements in favor of prolonged producer accountability (EPR) legal guidelines, which require corporations to take accountability for post-consumer waste, in accordance with McBee. As You Sow and Ubuntoo urged extra companies to affix them.

“This might inform the extra passage of extra state-level insurance policies right here within the U.S., or nationwide insurance policies across the globe, and to align the recycling contributions with plastic use depth,” McBee mentioned.

The scorecard breaks down Coca-Cola’s “B” grade. Beneath that, bar charts compare Coca-Cola with PepsiCo. Credit: As You Sow, Ubuntoo

In higher information

  • A lot of the 225 corporations have targets for making extra plastics recyclable, decreasing their use and that includes extra recycled materials.
  • Extra corporations are supporting new laws for EPR. Federal EPR coverage doesn’t exist within the U.S. Minnesota handed the nation’s fifth state EPR legislation in Could.

[Learn how companies are navigating the fast changing sustainability agenda and driving more impact with Trellis Network.]

Recent Articles

Related Stories

Leave A Reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay on op - Ge the daily news in your inbox